9 Comments
User's avatar
Danielle's avatar

Hmm. I really related to this in the context of shadow. Being at the edge of something emergent, perhaps unintentionally seeking out convergence with what's bubbling up, but not yet ready to step into the thing. More taking in a waypost, a curiousity, perhaps a jealousy, a triggering. Things like this can't be taught. They become material when we digest them in our bones, our flesh, once time for germination arises. Become the essay. The other writer. Not as a replica. Rather an unmasking, the product of your life splitting apart to accommodate what you both now know.

Jules Ember's avatar

Danielle,

“Become the essay” stopped me in my tracks.

I think what you’re pointing to is exactly why this territory has been so difficult for me to write about.

The most important things rarely arrive fully named.

They arrive as tension. Attraction. Irritation. Curiosity. Resonance. A feeling that something is present before we know what it is.

And you’re right. They can’t be taught.

At least not directly.

They have to be lived with long enough to become part of the person encountering them.

What I love about your framing is that it shifts the focus away from agreement and toward transformation. The question becomes less “Did I understand the essay?” and more “What is this becoming inside me?”

That feels very close to the phenomenon I was trying to describe.

Thank you for putting words around something I could feel but hadn’t yet articulated.

Jules 🖤

Psyche & Salt's avatar

So beautiful. This is so hard to name but I’ve experienced it. It’s like an unspoken resonance or frequency💫✨

RippleCodex's avatar

We come from the same nowhere and meet in the same nowhere

Maybe the fall wasn’t sin.

Maybe the fall was disorientation.

Maybe the apple wasn’t a punishment.

Maybe it was the moment significance became our responsibility.

Before that moment, everything was given. Orientation was complete. Meaning was built into the landscape.

Afterward, we entered a world of competing signals.

A world where attention could drift.

A world where significance had to be assigned.

And perhaps we’ve been here ever since.

Not lost.

Not abandoned.

Not waiting to leave.

Simply learning to orient.

The terrain changes.

Circumstances change.

What requires our attention changes.

But markers remain.

Every act of love.

Every act of courage.

Every moment of truth.

Every reminder to return to what matters.

Markers.

Signals.

Orientation points.

We’re not going anywhere.

The destination has never been the point. The experience is the point. And when the experience becomes difficult, perhaps the question is not:

“Why is this happening?”

But:

“What am I giving significance to?”

And:

“Do I still wish to give it that authority?”

Because meaning is not something we find once and keep forever. Meaning is something we participate in. Again and again. Signal by signal. Choice by choice. Moment by moment.

Jules Ember's avatar

Rip,

“Maybe the fall wasn’t sin. Maybe the fall was disorientation.”

That is a statement that will stop any in their scroll.

What struck me wasn’t the theological framing as much as the idea that meaning may not be something we inherit fully formed, but something we learn to participate in.

Your distinction between finding meaning and assigning significance feels important.

Especially because so much of what I’ve been exploring lately seems to begin with a feeling that something matters before I understand why.

Perhaps orientation begins there.

Not with certainty, but with attention.

Thank you for extending the conversation in a direction I hadn’t considered.

-Jules 🖤

RippleCodex's avatar

Jules —

I think you’re one of my markers.

Not because we share the same story.

Because every time I read your work I find a glyph that tells me someone else has been walking neighboring terrain.

Your response didn’t answer my thought.

It helped me see it.

That’s rarer.

Thank you for leaving markers.

— RippleCodex

Judy Grupenhoff's avatar

Yes! This phenomenon is so interesting to me as well. Sometimes the naming can be helpful, but other times I think what is needed is to sit with it before naming because the naming can flatten it before its full shape is known.

Jules Ember's avatar

Yes it was essentially my response to the question you raised in your chat thread…

"How do we stay in relationship with both lived experience and the frameworks we use to make sense of it, without letting either one dominate?"

Judy Grupenhoff's avatar

And something percolating in that wordless space for me is that maybe what we are sensing into the bigger field of information we are all a part of. What lies outside our cognitive and verbal frameworks. And it feels like there are many who are becoming more aware of that. And even if we don't have words, just shining a light in that direction can increase awareness. So thank you!